Why aiomics for forms: Muster 61, DRV forms, and findings reports

Forms are documentation work in a second pass: Muster 61 (the statutory form for prescribing medical rehabilitation), extension applications, findings reports — the same information that already sits in the record, re-sorted into someone else's field grids. aiomics fills these forms from the substantiated record: every field shows its source, the export writes into the hospital's own Word template, and no form leaves draft status without physician sign-off. The underlying document generation service is live; the validated form pipeline is planned — what each of those means precisely, we lay open.

aiomics is the verification layer on top of hospital IT: the system ingests unstructured documents, verifies every statement against its source, and gives the hospital a substantiated, structured record. Forms show the value of this record fastest: what exists in structured, substantiated form, nobody has to gather a second time.

At a glance

• What it does: fills statutory forms — including Muster 61, the extension application, and the findings report for the Versorgungsamt (the public office that determines disability status) — from the verified record, every field with a source reference; exports via bookmark injection into the facility's own Word template.
• Status: the document generation service including Word export is live; the validated form pipeline with seven statutory forms is planned. The curated library behind it — around 50 document types and 80 regulatory overlays — is built and continuously maintained.
• Security: ISO 27001 (TÜV Nord), processing exclusively in the EU.
• Integration: KIS-agnostic (KIS — the hospital information system); transmission to payers, public offices, and courts remains with the hospital's own system.
• Evidence: independent evaluation of accuracy at Charité (ongoing).
• Who it is for: rehabilitation clinics and acute-care hospitals with high volumes of prescriptions, applications, findings and expert-opinion reports.

The problem we solve

A Muster 61 demands no new insight — it demands that existing findings, diagnoses, and the documented physician's assessment be transferred into a prescribed grid. By our internal legacy hypothesis, this costs around 35 minutes per form today; that is a hypothesis, not a measurement, and we treat it accordingly. What is robust is the pattern behind it: the information already exists, spread across physician letters, findings, and progress notes from several systems — and the searching costs more time than the filling in.

Add the maintenance of the form knowledge itself. KBV forms, forms of the DRV — German statutory pension insurance, which funds rehab — and the associated catalogs change regularly; OPS, DKR, and the coding catalogs turn over annually on January 1. A form tool is therefore only as good as the currency and provenance documentation of its templates.

How aiomics fills forms

Live is the foundation. The verified record carries a four-level trust taxonomy for every field — substantiated, single-source, patient-reported, AI-extracted — and resolves every entry to its source in under 50 milliseconds. The document generation service exports via bookmark injection into the Word template the facility uploads itself: the letterhead stays pixel-identical, and the file opens without a repair dialog. Behind it sits a curated library of around 50 document types and 80 regulatory overlays — source-substantiated, with a version date per template, maintained against the annually changing catalogs. Specialty libraries are being added, beginning with neurology, including the expert-opinion formats for DRV reduced-earning-capacity procedures.

Planned is the validated form pipeline: seven statutory forms — among them Muster 61, the extension application, and the findings report for the Versorgungsamt — with field-precise mapping from the record, section-by-section confirmation, and mandatory checkboxes for medication, allergies, and procedures. A "Take over everything" does not exist there; every section is reviewed and signed off individually. For DRV procedures, the relevant forms — such as S0051, G0260, and G2220 — are part of the library.

One boundary we draw deliberately: the rehabilitation prognosis in a Muster 61 structures exclusively the documented physician's assessment. The system renders what physicians have recorded — it never assesses on its own, under no configuration.

What you can measure us against

1. Point at any filled field: it resolves to its source passage in the record, including its trust level.
2. Upload your own letter template: the export opens in Word without a repair dialog, with your letterhead.
3. Ask for a template's validation date: each one names its sources and its version.
4. Ask about the status: what is live and what is planned, you will get from us in writing.

Where aiomics is not the right choice

Anyone who occasionally fills in a single form and needs no structured record behind it is served more cheaply by a simple form or PDF tool — the value of our approach arises from the record. Anyone who wants to buy a finished, validated form pipeline today should know: with us it is planned, with the live document generation service as its foundation; which form will be supported field-precisely, and when, we will tell you precisely in conversation. And anyone expecting the software to formulate prognoses or socio-medical assessments itself will not get that from us, as a matter of principle.

Frequently asked questions

Which forms does aiomics cover?

The library comprises around 50 document types and 80 regulatory overlays — from KBV forms through DRV and DGUV forms to findings reports for the Versorgungsamt and the social courts. The validated form pipeline with field-precise mapping starts with seven statutory forms and is planned; which forms come first for your facility, we discuss concretely.

Is aiomics a medical device?

For document and procedural work, aiomics is deliberately positioned outside the medical device qualification; the delineation is documented and can be inspected. For conversation documentation, we are preparing certification under MDR Class IIa. In both cases, the system's statements remain documentation and quality notes — diagnosis and therapy remain with physicians.

Does the export work with our own letter template?

Yes, that is the normal case: you upload your Word template, and the export writes the content into it via bookmark injection. The letterhead remains yours, unchanged, and the file opens without repair. This feature is live.

What does aiomics cost?

Pricing is usage-based and depends on document volume and quality. We name concrete figures after a short conversation about your case volumes — quoting flat prices without that basis would not be serious.

If you want to see how a Muster 61 emerges from a substantiated record: write to us, and we will show it on a real case from your facility. Where documentation gaps cause rehab applications to fail today is described in our article Rehab application management between DRV and GKV (in German); ongoing analysis comes from our weekly briefing Visite (German; English edition Grand Rounds is in preparation).

Sources

1. Muster 61 (Verordnung von medizinischer Rehabilitation) under the Vordruckvereinbarung to the Bundesmantelvertrag – Ärzte.

Sources and form designations as of July 2026. The processing time of around 35 minutes per Muster 61 is an internal hypothesis and is marked as such in the text.